Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA454431FD0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id g9qm0hcjQsft for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18DFF431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2005429A056;
	Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6AE4E254183; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>,
	Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	Florian Friesdorf <flo@chaoflow.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: address completion when composing
In-Reply-To: <87tycuza1x.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
References: <87fwolh1mu.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
 <87d3jph107.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
	<87oc39i2a4.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<877h9whjhi.fsf@eve.chaoflow.net>
	<87mxisgyhf.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>	<87tycuza1x.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:30:45 -0700
Message-ID: <87zkmm9nii.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:30:55 -0000

--=-=-=

On Mon, 16 May 2011 22:04:42 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> No, just the terms are, not the full string. (although for search, that
> could actually be enough)

Right. It's easy enough to search on the "To:" field. But for address
completion, I think we realyl will want to fix the database to store
complete names+addresses that can be recovered for messages matching a
search.

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3RwbUACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWiiGwCfYN9L8cBMbExf5PoRLNKt4C+2
bH4AnRdwaDub7nbbF/s0Wh1pWS9ZIGdm
=3IEs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--