Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B7404947 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.306 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.307, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GL4pXdaaIepM for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ACA404946 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so557937bwz.0 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject; bh=3YijT0/gpSkeEGmSBqf5bLbM2EcxYmuxVlZuD6cad2k=; b=azhn1PN+lAm0/YbFXlbP1ryey0q+Bz14wPsD6Pps6Y8XohW19uoZZWx0dkYuQOsMlF /LHM4pfxAnC9GniqYBikrrT5Iiikz5X6qM3zWxp+WoNoNX550Qlyy5EVtZ0VyGmlcQyl F/XOavmRDL5r4maFRvce+HBvly/nlYuxdf/Ck= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject; b=xlasX+9mDRLvgB/UdlKFUrkvOOtTYZ3eDCzFoLqIXr2g0MXvCWXsknlki4iTQjtzFK ezr+xkxVwGFuetXf51rbFoaZTLidxpW4dyegF2aBu2XnAu+LqeQazpqGpK53TyZwe6K8 ALlWzZOjluVsPOB2AGCM20eKyJWyVOpBQBjGQ= Received: by 10.204.155.69 with SMTP id r5mr149535bkw.0.1268784212714; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (physnat56.physics.umass.edu [128.119.50.56]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g18sm28272710bkw.7.2010.03.16.17.03.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ba01c54.9298cc0a.66cd.7695@mx.google.com> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:03:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Ben Gamari To: notmuch Subject: [notmuch] Tag search peculiarities X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:03:34 -0000 Hey all, While trying perfect my initial tagging script, I have run into a very strange set of issue. In my script, I use the following to exclude mailing list traffic from my inbox, notmuch tag -new tag:new and tag:list notmuch tag -new +inbox tag:new However, I found that mailing list traffic was still getting through. After investigating further, I found that any query in the form of "tag:inbox and tag:$TAG" would return no results. Strangely, all other combinations of tag searches (i.e. "tag:lkml and tag:unread") seem to work just fine. Has anyone else noticed this sort of behavior? Does the inbox tag have some special signifigance that I should know of? Is my index just FUBAR? (the ladder would be very strange considering it's only a few days old and I can't think of any crashes, etc. that might have corrupted it) Any ideas for debugging? Thanks! - Ben