Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F329A6DE141B for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:38:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.307 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3zhaJlOONEfc for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:38:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4B46DE02C9 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 04:38:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVesi-0002It-RF; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:37:28 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 23250 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:38:09 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: encoding of message-ids User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:38:09 -0400 Message-ID: <87si0svnim.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:38:20 -0000 I spent a little time this morning staring at the code, and it seems that all of the message-ids are parsed via g_mime_decode_text, which deals with RFC2047 encodings and makes guesses at decoding 8bit characters. In practice this means that in the notmuch database all headers are UTF-8. Since message-id's are supposed to be printable ascii [at least in rfc5322], this seems like not such a terrible decision, but I wonder if we should document this potential conversion somewhere? d