Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECD4431FBC for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:17:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0pKd724N9Y9 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:17:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca (pivot.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.57]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9CD431FAE for ; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142167182194.pppoe-dynamic.high-speed.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.167.182.194] helo=rocinante.cs.unb.ca) by pivot.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NOd4J-0001OB-Vk; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:16:56 -0400 Received: from bremner by rocinante.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NOd2X-00005s-6F; Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:15:05 -0400 From: David Bremner To: micah anderson , Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87ws094k55.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> References: <87tyvenwdw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87ws09af52.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <87ws094k55.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:15:04 -0400 Message-ID: <87tyvda3w7.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Verified: bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca Subject: Re: [notmuch] update on delete/rename support X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2009 20:17:01 -0000 On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:20:38 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > >You may have to wrap your "notmuch new" call in a "notmuch save", > >"notmuch restore" pair if you discover things coming back to your > >inbox > > do you mean "notmuch dump" here instead of "notmuch save"? Yes, sorry. > I'm trying to unpack what you are saying here. Are you saying that if > you are getting things coming back into your inbox, and you have not > applied your "lazy restore" patch, then you would need a script to check > your email which does: > > notmuch dump > /tmp/notmuch.dump > offlineimap > notmuch new > notmuch restore < /tmp/notmuch.dump The script is the same in both cases, but without my patch, it takes more like 10 minutes for me. d