Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2FED431FC2
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:02:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id CIBhWayduTus for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95A0E431FD8
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
	([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet)
	by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1S1KMQ-0001tu-0a; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:38 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1S1KMJ-0007s3-Sg; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>,
	Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] emacs: more flexible and consistent tagging
	operations
In-Reply-To: <878vjtqhcg.fsf@praet.org>
References: <1327725684-5887-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
	<1328426033-21480-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
	<87wr7xqpuf.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <878vjtqhcg.fsf@praet.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+239~g4d2d96b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400
Message-ID: <87haye6g1c.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam_bar: -
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:03:00 -0000

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> > On Sun,  5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does),
> but 'C-u *' only to open messages?  That would make more sense IMHO.
> 
> But, conforming to your original request, I've implemented the inverse.
> 

Thanks for implementing that. I could live with either way. Do other
people have opinions on this? My reasoning is if you descend into a
thread from some search page, it seems likely that you want to operate
on the messages matching the search.

d