From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca>, David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
Subject: Re: priorities for 0.13
In-Reply-To:
 <CAMoJFUsi5xAX4e2eeSd_jC6-u-VD9o_t511Ce1eGHMqMaqe3xA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <878vhkvvqi.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<CAMoJFUsi5xAX4e2eeSd_jC6-u-VD9o_t511Ce1eGHMqMaqe3xA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:02:22 +0300
Message-ID: <m2liljwxr5.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

On Wed, Apr 25 2012, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> wrote:

> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:31, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
>> I'd like to have a feature freeze for 0.13 sometime in the first week of
>> May. =C2=A0What do people feel are priorities to try to get reviewed and
>> pushed for 0.13?
>
> I would like to get the HTML reply series [1] in before 0.13, since
> otherwise the reply stuff that's already pushed can cause some ugly
> (but not buggy) behavior, quoting raw HTML in reply. There's been one
> review, and it's a small patch, but I think it could use another set
> of eyes.
>
> [1] id:"1335056093-17621-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca"

Yes I agree on this -- I've been hand-adding text from html-only email
to my reply buffers for now. Is there anything to comment on Mark's=20
thoughts there ?

I browsed through http://nmbug.tethera.net/status/ ; personally I'd like to
see id:"1327996914-9644-3-git-send-email-dme@dme.org".

Also the 'Maybe Ready' queue looks good (as it should be). And the few
(trivial) patches Austin is going to send (and we have reviewed) that
are good to get before SONAME change are good to have.

> -- Adam

Tomi