Return-Path: <xavier@maillard.im>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02006418C36
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.492
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.492 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1]
	autolearn=no
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id XxKLdKnT0eVV for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [82.244.211.40])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7EB418C34
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj [127.0.0.1])
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066561E076;
	Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
	:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version
	:content-type; s=postfix; bh=VDjrLFcf3WCo11YB5dUVwzNisgY=; b=LEb
	fXrCm3RDc+a9NVcNa6jPOsdjPn7lbehHI5ks5PE8ccmZXCvQ+QKWhWw4CpJ2NXM4
	ouiurUofFpQCBzqVTKAQUvIAbOwrvVHI0UMrzoO54CDM86YGeu3SmUhxHRWMOJKA
	0EnFDgCFvcLDziwPaTQ+rtrV2oftAiI1jL5cWx74=
Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA;
	Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:24:15 +0200 (CEST)
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Debian package update ?
In-Reply-To: <8763436wn0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <m2d3yee8bg.fsf@deb.maillard.im>
	<8763436wn0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:46:27 +0200
Message-ID: <m2y6gv774c.fsf@deb.maillard.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 19:24:19 -0000

Hi Carl,

On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:43:47 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:51 +0200, Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> wrote:
> > I feel like being far behind master with my current (official)
> > Debian package. Is there any chance to get a more recent one soon ?
> 
> I did update the Debian packaging yesterday, and uploaded new
> packages. (The upload might take a while before it appears since it
> added new libnotmuch1 and libnotmuch-dev packages that will have to be
> approved.)

Got it now ! Thank you very much.
 
> It took me a while to get around to updating the Debian package because
> the new library meant reworking the package a bit, I wanted to do an
> actual tar-file release before a new package, etc.

Like I said before, I wish I could have learnt how to package it
by myself but, it is out of my knowledge :/
 
> With all of that stuff implemented now, it should be a very quick
> process to update the packages in the future. So hopefully there won't
> be much skew going forward.

That's perfect ! I switched to a packaged distro just not to
install every tarball possible everywhere into my root :)

Xavier