Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21279431FBC for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.401 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d8fBa0nVKZdi for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80A54431FAE for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 14:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TfelL-0000kO-Tc; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:20 +0000 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TfelL-0004ky-Ki; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:19 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Allow emacs to toggle display of all parts including multipart In-Reply-To: <1354496317-24564-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> References: <1354496317-24564-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+81~g9730584 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87zk1uvjp9.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 47c21428a9b3ed77dfb2c7d06e543307 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.1 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.1 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails * 0.2 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:45:32 -0000 Hi I now have a version which does this `right': using invisibility as with citations and signatures etc. It is working but I need to look through more carefully before posting. Best wishes Mark On Mon, 03 Dec 2012, Mark Walters wrote: > This is rather more polished version of > id:1351152563-27277-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com. > > The first patch modifies the behaviour of show refresh buffer to keep > state more accurately where possible. It can never be perfect but it > makes a reasonable attempt. This is independent of patches 2 and 3. > > The second patch allows the user to toggle the visibility of any part > with 't' on the part button. It does this by storing a list of all > parts that the user has over-ruled. > > The final patch binds the toggle to the default action in cases where > the part has no filename. Is this a reasonable heuristic? And should > it be customisable? In all cases the defined actions (save, view, > other, and toggle) always do their action (ie they do not apply any > heuristics) > > Overall I am pleased with the way it works. The one caveat is that it > does redisplay the whole buffer when toggling the parts: it might be > nice to use invisibility but that is beyond my lisp. Moreover it could > be added at a later stage without changing the user experience. > > > Best wishes > > Mark > > > Mark Walters (3): > emacs: show: make refresh fix point(ish) > emacs: allow the user to toggle the visibility of > multipart/alternative parts > emacs: show make default part button toggle view when sensible > > emacs/notmuch-show.el | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > -- > 1.7.9.1