From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
Cc: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
In-Reply-To: <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>
References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>
 <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:17:44 -0400
Message-ID: <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list

"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:33:10AM -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>> We can include it in /usr/bin along and install a proper man page=E2=80=
=A6
>
> I'm happy to write up a man page.  Do you want it in a separate
> directory from nmbug-status / notmuch-report [1]?  Do you want to
> rename nmbug to something notmuch-* namespaced?
>

I guess if we're going to treat it as a first class citizen, then yeah,
it should be in the notmuch- namespace. It would also need some tests.
I'm not sure how (or if) to address the problem that most notmuch
commands are actually invoked via the main binary, but I don't think we
have any logic to transform "notmuch foo" to a call to an external
binary notmuch-foo.

d