Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBEE431FD6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id cLwMw-Gw9mse for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6E8431FC4
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net
	([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet)
	by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa
	(TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1U4XDF-000448-KQ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:45:04 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1U4XD9-0003B7-VB; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Robert Mast <beheerder@tekenbeetziekten.nl>
Subject: RE: [Spam-verdenking][english 100%] Re: another bug fix release:
	0.15.2, in progress.
In-Reply-To: <003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl>
References: <1359501973-27671-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net>
	<87bobt9dcq.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<003b01ce0791$39239a50$ab6acef0$@nl>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:44:51 -0400
Message-ID: <87y5ew8er0.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam_bar: -
Cc: Notmuch List <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:24:34 -0000

Robert Mast <beheerder@tekenbeetziekten.nl> writes:

> David/Austin,
>
> I sent it as a patch to my previous patch. Is that correct, or should I first 'revert' the file to 15.1?
>
> Robert

Hi Robert;

I didn't see any followup patch from you on the list; can you tell me the
message-id?

In any case, in general you should send complete patches or or patch series
against git master, since we care both about the commit message, and what
changes are part of each commit.  Most people use the git rebase command
to update patches before re-sending them.

d