Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0A431FB6 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mtaLDqWpE5t for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61A68431FAE for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ho1so4220441wib.5 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=5InkWHwQwvapJBeWtuv/koIeOZPrnHRfgo0pDnuTwxg=; b=JO1y/YKmrdjq7bBq8E1LPLUoQFBDvIDgFxFsnaT/I4IytJuvY5S54TBt1CIxyFRaL8 Ea+io2BEmfaGjaauXpryF2RrCxZRvIxbv2CPr3bt3Grf3Rok16o4140PWIOI2p4L8U0h KHO8aSGqaSqu3HMq3oxhZf/VeEsfr9+oLlldKNc2RSs24jCbL1VPGn4UDQs8zIXbb7OP HnL77cdDs9X6gycCb+x5vEabMDbaxAXREic43BJf55lPOokGG7LXE7NsGhhybjmCV6wT cgrjwM3Jw1vbdsexMVESLY6ge+2eEVdcRkW2eFHkJsuiwju5aS0BtjYK6p5Ivi45Dz2k ZX5w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm/58+UoTxOdkLAYr7jhymnV7kiRSnPUHZIVXJw1BLyso62uHA6r0ajIPSnjIWYY3r7196G X-Received: by 10.180.75.229 with SMTP id f5mr3009119wiw.81.1410788957810; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:f00a:9c2f:b998:3319]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xm4sm11750417wib.9.2014.09.15.06.49.17 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 06:49:17 -0700 (PDT) To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: multiple machine tagging In-Reply-To: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> References: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:49:16 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 13:49:25 -0000 On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote: (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?) > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple > machines? > > In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered > identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine > - it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are > a problem, though. Is there any significant change to this picture? I've been backing up my tags using 'notmuch dump' and a simple "newest wins" merge (so that I don't lose tags for messages that are not in the database at the time of the dump) followed by git. This is okay for a backup solution (I've needed it a couple of times!), but not ideal for a multi-machine environment.