Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:31:52 -0500
From: Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Message-ID: <20091122043152.GF17268@jukie.net>
References: <20091121183909.GG24944@jukie.net>
	<20091121190606.GA24602@excalibur.local>
	<20091121191402.GA17268@jukie.net>
	<871vjr4olh.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871vjr4olh.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch vim support
Precedence: list

* Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> [091121 15:20]:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:14:02 -0500, Bart Trojanowski <bart@jukie.net> wrote:
> > Perfect.  How would you like to proceed with the initial integration?
> > Pulling my tree, or me squashing all the changes into a single patch?
> > Also, are you OK with where the files live (ie under a vim directory).
> 
> I'm glad to pull (it will be nice for you to have the accurate
> history). And a vim directory sounds perfect.

Indeed.

> Or should we do interfaces/emacs and interfaces/vim ? I don't know.

I don't really have a preference.  As long as 'make install' at the top
doesn't install both/either blindly.

> Email or pull requests are fine. You're clearly the "owner" of the vim
> stuff, so don't expect any refusals to pull from me. (And feel free to
> ping me out of band if you don't want to clutter the list with pull
> requests---but it's more likely that you'll want to let people on the
> list know about changes anyway.)

Great.  Thanks.  I'll keep the list informed.

-Bart

-- 
				WebSig: http://www.jukie.net/~bart/sig/