Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004556DE012F for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:50:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.019 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6L8iUmBrjrgv for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:50:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2DD6DE0127 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 17:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1435FF997; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E1061FFD1; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:50:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs replying produces excessive indenting on multipart/signed or multipart/mixed amil? In-Reply-To: <8760vn7k5g.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87lh4nm62m.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <87wpo6fvju.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87ziszson5.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> <8760vn7k5g.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+124~gbf604e9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:50:33 -0400 Message-ID: <87oa9fsl9i.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:50:44 -0000 On Mon 2016-04-11 20:20:11 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > I have the feeling I don't understand the problem. I replied to your > message, and didn't see any extra indentation there. I thought my reply > to the list was test enough. So what am I missing? Aha, it is due to a setting, thanks. it's due to notmuch-show-indent-multipart -- try setting it to "t" ? i find that setting useful during notmuch-show buffers, but i don't think it should apply when generating a reply message. --dkg