Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01326DE0AC2 for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:44:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.025 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.025 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQL_m2leKEnv for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:44:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D50A16DE02CE for ; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id c200so35320577wme.0 for ; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dme-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=XNZmCDmZdQ90PkKCT9C8Iy4X+sHxU0EAtamrFnSytjY=; b=YZY3Vpd79BHjLrRUgxTgbLQzEktaeQfJjrXqYyGtK6gLrTdWb8IzIb0ve0tzpEGVre GmAYyLocYzToxS39ltkH/xG+2rWb6RTqR+vodWGeJBOEy2GroIbPacrGi1OCJABkpCKM Ztl1iVcwQCtPVOReNUtEiyio8Pds4KTR7qc0aa5mjRVLxatb5t2r3GrFTG0ZstJv6wld z81RwD0j2u/jSn8r1IvQcl4aSsS+RAu5ZeVIIoJCDlvV812V/nENk8EEKNRPA6Ll2ume Tcrx3MMXzK66pdV4YzsTzo0ZWMegFQPuFWsrMB36qmS+15YsmpNkHTtFPZucvFRRyDGC IlTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=XNZmCDmZdQ90PkKCT9C8Iy4X+sHxU0EAtamrFnSytjY=; b=Oa403AfmlklACYa+rWUHXFzwltO4Rc/lbFdOcbsNuv0AdTD1wfYnJsxyeLz++LpagA ZR/LQ7sRYkDgRjG9KT43Tsjz7grhm1ZizLoD33iqdF7RbUFtAzImqtCC0TQEU78XGfX2 o2UE3F7bdXs4+c838HMo13vGpp0Jjy+ah2jjNgAlvV0rH/4dHEOJHGjpWCccGu02QihF Q50Dqgl+djpdHdeOBudk35mDxLMdrXdiXkypk3vOaFL3NEl6r1LekNtPnjbIRFqS9VGw S8fpxuY5QlhN3QRFORlmYf75FOmA/9mshRa1difpgkiICB5OqAF9C5oQURJjOLCodc3k j61g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSW9tVIu2BJfBOyx4Wdu0xZjyi26LB7e6CCPSSSYiWA3M5lcbUQpjlMABLflxiIoA== X-Received: by 10.194.250.39 with SMTP id yz7mr33565509wjc.92.1454967855903; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from disaster-area.hh.sledj.net ([2a01:348:1a2:1:ea39:35ff:fe2c:a227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x186sm14399398wmg.19.2016.02.08.13.44.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Feb 2016 13:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (disaster-area.hh.sledj.net [local]) by disaster-area.hh.sledj.net (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id d172dd3e; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:44:13 +0000 (UTC) To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , David Bremner , Gaudenz Steinlin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, 810784@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: [Gaudenz Steinlin] Bug#810784: should match email adress case insensitive when sending encrypted mail In-Reply-To: <874mee7k88.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> References: <87egdm4ujh.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> <874mee7k88.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:44:13 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:44:20 -0000 On Fri, Jan 15 2016, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > So where is the case-insensitive lookup happening? Is this a bug in > mml-mode, or in notmuch-emacs? It's caused by behaviour in mml2015.el (hence upstream). `mml2015-epg-check-user-id' uses `equal' to compare the recipient from the composition buffer with the addresses from the matching key. The simplest way to get the desired behaviour would be to `downcase' both strings before comparing.