Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0BC431FD0 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqmyvYjAbM4Z for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A6E431FB6 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240F629A041; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0BCEC254157; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Sebastien Binet , Jameson Graef Rollins Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ? In-Reply-To: <87ei2m8imo.fsf@cern.ch> References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch> <87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch> <87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch> <87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <878vsv9eam.fsf@cern.ch> <87oc1qet0v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87ei2m8imo.fsf@cern.ch> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 06:47:46 -0700 Message-ID: <87pqm6f059.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 13:47:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:50:23 +0200, Sebastien Binet w= rote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:20 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > Perhaps this is an emacs bug? > could be, but, >=20 > > I'm using Debian's emacs 23.3.1 and have not encountered the problem > > described. > I don't see anything related to 'point', 'point-invisible-p' nor 'forward= -char' in there: > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/emacs23/23.3+1-1 Perhaps I was confused. I thought 23.3.1 was a distinct upstream release From=2023.3, but maybe not, (emacs version numbers use 1-based indexing perhaps?). > anyways... for the moment I'll just live with it... Sorry about that. > except if somebody has some insights on how to "catch" the 'End of > buffer' error and add some more protective programming around the > 'scroll-up' function ? My emacs lisp skills are primarily restricted to actual experimentation. So if I can replicate the bug, I might be able to find a fix. I'm not very good at doing theoretical fixes with emacs lisp code. =2DCarl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4B8oIACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWgCmwCeKRNeJp6Ss/DXXf7XC77PRiE7 frgAn0mydN3XvApbZwcG28HmpjaJ5E7P =M60E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--