Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5D8431FBC;
	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:34:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id a-RnxLDRNTLG; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A3B431FAE;
	Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:34:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>, Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org>,
	Mikhail Gusarov <dottedmag@dottedmag.net>
In-Reply-To: <87vdh1472z.fsf@59A2.org>
References: <87ws1hldmu.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de>
	<87einpl50j.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ljhxjq5i.fsf@vertex.dottedmag>
	<876391l2si.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87vdh1472z.fsf@59A2.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:34:12 -0800
Message-ID: <871vjlrv8b.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] Notmuch doesn't index new mails when mail location
 contains symlinks
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:34:26 -0000

On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:03:00 +0100, Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org> wrote:
> > But still no luck.  Finally, I deleted the symlinks and created them
> > anew, and then it indexed the 12 new mails that arrived in the
> > meantime.

OK. So that's definitely a bug we need to fix.

> The real solution is for notmuch to check mtime of whatever the
> symlink's target.

I'm a little confused here. Notmuch only uses stat, so it should be
looking at the target's mtime already. It actually takes special effort
(via lstat) to get at the mtime of the link itself.

So why aren't things just working?

-Carl