Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A61E431FD0 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:16:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SMM4aa1dhH6w for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD8C431FB6 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by earth-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF0F66E0443; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:16:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on earth-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-98-149-172-122.socal.res.rr.com [98.149.172.122]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by earth-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A89766E0434; Tue, 31 May 2011 09:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by servo.finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D5CF1604; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:18:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Felix Geller , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Decryption fails In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-196-g473f9b2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 00:18:26 -0700 Message-ID: <87wrh7ibi5.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 16:16:37 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller wrote: > Most of the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which > ones are actually supposed to work. Hey, Felix. As David said, all crypto tests should be passing with libgmime 2.4.24. It would probably be instructive to know which crypto tests failed and why. Maybe you could supply some output from the failed crypto tests. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJN5JZCAAoJEO00zqvie6q8P+IP/0FnZcDIWLtTl1N06RIzZAeh Xl+0Ygq6CyruiF7BsVM6hRtHzEEz8SXcI8wiepAmxAdpiMrnrxobHUyhccQQsRT/ 6LEQDvo+Sp3H9IQzp43hfFiY5ZcIdX5o8BMbsSEAkusEpaRC9NuHrH2paesmiZZP AhYE3AN4I+D7i9STPrMSlEohEV/zy9bcgM0Cy0THzCaLtrV9DlRNRxj9tcgsMag8 0fbtgq6I9oj/fHv/spPNKr5wMm1GrGMfKQN1QyDBnePxU8kbwUkDchrZHmM/EaWl 7tvLLOI31p2+awSrgBpG4YYXI9do+6RBR922hPljPvjunKKPdYb6ACA19yS3guPY e63NXWPm8flwIn5Qn4Ov6ARzQgU4NsLCXEktDxUY8QYt0+g21Ei123/M5/nU/olQ yi4QPJvBahdNBxt+/0GOHGUW8jUDsjiLGhaN7WXhmTUYxR+HzonhIVBPjE8lnvYR k0zuX3bXdZmeyThQms4/OeXRNYyWQd8GGz57ixr+DH/+5F9k3VLJ62hHzUUcjx6p aWPJggfHVCR5mHS9w0Iw0f+oVd9qjncF9NHy+5LdM5jUr1y94PmKeMBnh9SIBHIV M2m/a9ach+IsKbJ4RXw4P9kVytZJ3c62daPDla2tjrjnCGJSdkgdKSNM7sKrwTgy OMwjdJejPffMUnTba4t9 =w7c+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--