Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB186DE1607 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:55:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.157 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.239, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fml8ElfFTOdt for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133756DE0B64 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BACA10008D; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 22:55:33 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] cli: change the data structure for notmuch address deduplication In-Reply-To: <87bncs2dov.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87fv242e2a.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87bncs2dov.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+68~g0c35549 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 19:55:29 -0000 On Thu, Sep 24 2015, David Bremner wrote: > David Bremner writes: > >> Jani Nikula writes: >> >> >>> + else >>> + v = !!m1->name - !!m2->name; >> >> Is this really idiomatic? It seems a little difficult to follow to me. >> For me it took a while to grasp the meaning of that but after I spent a minute looking at it it become clear to me. this part +1 > Sorry, this stupid MUA I'm using confused me and I sent the reply > halfway through reading the patch. Anyway, the rest looks OK. > > d Tomi