To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>, Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] emacs: break up notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal
	into two generally useful functions
In-Reply-To: <87sjjeytfx.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <871uqy19yo.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
	<1326823531-14549-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net>
	<m2d3aiay4f.fsf@gmail.com> <87sjjeytfx.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+64~g42e8f66 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:14:59 +0000
Message-ID: <cun8vl5o29o.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:17:54 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=
ucture.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:10:40 -0500, Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
> > This should be a docstring instead of a comment.  (This applies equally
> > to the old version....)
>=20
> We're not currently in the habit of adding doc strings for
> non-interactive programs.  Do we need to go down that route?

They are nice to have, especially if we already have the comment.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8Wf4QACgkQaezQq/BJZRbf3gCePkExmnGp6b7dfiKXSp5ffOzS
e/8AniRt0jYeVxcUqAQ95ncWd6LHLytV
=zbmd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--