Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7277F431FAF for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:55:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eiRT-ba95uDX for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6B431FAE for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:55:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from pip.fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0003F970 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:55:35 -0500 (EST) Received: by pip.fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D43E41187C; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:55:52 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update crypto test for gmime 2.6.5 In-Reply-To: <4F43F442.1030501@fifthhorseman.net> References: <1329840343-10026-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net> <4F43F442.1030501@fifthhorseman.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:55:44 -0500 Message-ID: <877gzfiqcf.fsf@pip.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list Reply-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 01:55:40 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 14:45:06 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On 02/21/2012 11:49 AM, Tomi Ollila wrote: > > I'm in favor of gmime >=3D 2.6.5 requirement. >=20 > I tend to agree with Tomi here. I'm going to work on getting gmime > 2.6.5 into debian later today. gmime 2.6.6 is now in debian unstable. You can expect to see it on the mirrors in the next day or so. --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJPREsjXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwRUU1QkU5NzkyODJEODBCOUY3NTQwRjFD Q0QyRUQ5NEQyMTczOUU5AAoJEMzS7ZTSFznpKhYP/3k6xNjK2l1JU/y4j8SyzPaO ZcpLR6+M6jU6YixjzcaTs2EGKj3TVKgUOrwcRTjCVZbf8PxkW5ZukNyvefJNPiqp 4pS79QWDVuDy4dUZx1Meu/VKoduehpJBiJLW2z0PQXtMZtqYfImeuAbAD6Fi8wf8 gio8SQJbYDduxU3yyuMZft0YiQ1xzY2LTTBQV0f3tZhGx/12VgdsDsCuduM8RTNX CIsQuuTHbpuDXtUvQ/6nb76g22i/1d7D9lXQUCddW+4YkWHedq5TQ0es2cXDjfU5 h5pyDKsoUW25TIkQfLCBzKfb9fGDoktPe9GODSGYGNXW5zVBJGLReLevKnRoxmZV LI/YSERy9HOg9Y1/N0ml87gWJN1CkWQDYwcSK4GttyyxenBw+6pXgWOYUIELdapi 0N1aDQ+d5Vpz/XarUG8jx9WGCONbGvQJgse0PN0V+ZDNH0odYsMJTDXKUstP+4O3 5IDeuAioxTi5cUOnOi5Z7bilQOtPXl6SKPi2Q2dK6M8qXmrYUnhYbrUUuRNEtkBi 810ucQcgZriZAc51zOQ4c4nEqXP6vFMWQpOgXcX8GrTC+ccHxLDOkvr2YGH0OI5f mHiabpcmWug74g9S3e6JKR8yTvqkspFjcD8oqT6QWR+Tpw56wmsPiUVS8efWlHCq OWyuqJ86SE2Aj2ZG6YA1 =gyGU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--