Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2AA431FBD for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:17:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gcVrsY7dE69C for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB973431FBC for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WZkTe-0005mS-Hy; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:15:26 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 3709 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:15:13 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: sign/encrypt replies to signed/encrypted messages In-Reply-To: <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> References: <87a9f1c8aq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+174~g4efbc9f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:15:13 -0300 Message-ID: <8738hf25pa.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:17:40 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > +(defun notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (parts) > + (loop for part in parts > + if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/signed") > + do (mml-secure-message-sign) How do people feel about disabling/removing the previous two lines? It's less obvious to me that you always want to sign in reply to a signed message (probably you want to unconditionally always sign in that case). As written this causes some inconvenience for users that have notmuch-crypto-process-mime=t to verify inbound signatures, but don't necessarily have the ability to sign outbound mail. > + else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/encrypted") > + do (mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt) > + else if (notmuch-match-content-type (plist-get part :content-type) "multipart/*") > + do (notmuch-mua-reply-crypto (plist-get part :content)))) > +