Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2744196F2 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:47:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.009 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FP47zP+r-nKi for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE4C431FC1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (geco.phys.columbia.edu [128.59.170.159]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3LJlF4v014835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:47:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O4ftD-0002xT-Iz; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:47:15 -0400 From: Jameson Rollins To: Carl Worth , David Edmondson , notmuch Subject: Re: pull request In-Reply-To: <87vdbkfwgr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87sk722sfq.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87eiibq22s.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87ljcj2u4z.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <8739yq8zix.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <877ho2w0ov.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87fx2p0yjt.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87vdbkfwgr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:47:12 -0400 Message-ID: <87k4s0bnb3.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:47:19 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:15:48 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > [*] Even more simplification is possible if we stop trying to hide > header components. Several people have requested that To and Cc be > visible all the time. Hey, Carl. I had actually been meaning to bring this up. I actually don't like having the headers collapsed at all, so I am definitely in favor of the idea of doing away with this "feature". At the very least, I would like to see header hiding/collapsing be an option, so that I could turn it off. As is, I'm having to hit 'h' for every message I view, so I can just see who the message was sent to (not to mention to recover the unfortunately missing blank line between the header and the body, which is visually useful). jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLz1ZAAAoJEO00zqvie6q8HicP/3tcrzWKZ2W/aaXHsg+2HyZu klebUVxr4T5VxpvJQ/LDLTgQFKFMQdYiqnWyOzEENh7mr/AXpmIdlxchdkU/2DWY YQiIgfQi1Yuh3YWgNowkO+/N9HAhBBpyCFE8Snq1hpF75iG0fV2ZufyKPIUMRydt 0C4VOOw84gAhso8nprpRSI6YktKDp3XsPddR6PHQR0J26/PAcEDAYOCoCmYJvh6c jINYgqthnz8r8tq+0ftKQVJRVBhImLUkfnoOfSHo6L531OxezFt4Zk0UnIxVp8W5 oe9oKMikUJjZPHmgdkSjRObRKkVmN7DVYKSFjA1c+x6C+U2Zv9K1hLQsqQcS7bl6 H8Krc3BeYFcFguksBXz4WWY+ldiUpiV4/ad6rZDWD4rPwA98XoUrFEbR0HFxozP1 RG2ji/IE+Djj/TQCgkUbW/+PTQ9Sc83ciynaNNxOWCNSticF3ZTt6IJelyO1G9ma AtowNqOh1OCN4+F8ppVaTH96STLl+GAJpCcSxwBw0wveh2bMtzrR0Dz3DwJvTfjW 4iK+vnWAYJAFMaj2+/GVpfjyvwf4RyxtNq0ELkgeIly8pxlDKwRm75ju4HV4W7LH tF8XS9/NzFX7WAtnhNZ/opdLgEmjI+3vh+YY5SEFSIXFUhM3twJZJ4v9w0uWrAj/ NqOxn5csUvY4vj4OmiOz =o5g+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--