Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5898C431FAE for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01TAMLvou8Lf for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055DF431FBC for ; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keithp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C188B9402F; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at keithp.com Received: from keithp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keithp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 4m-EcP8a0g5S; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by keithp.com (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 6BDDBB84011; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from keithp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keithp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C395B80040; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:27 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Packard To: Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87639122sx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:43:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:43:32 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:16:54 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > So what next for the user? We've got lots of empty space in the folder > view, so I think what I'd like is to provide some suggestions on search > strings to try, and then to make it obvious how to associate a name with > a search string. And at that point, I'd like that name to be added to > the folder view. Right, associate a name for the search from the *search* view instead of the folder view. Then it's just a matter of using that command and typing a name. At that point, you get the new folder (or named search) added to the main window. That's a great plan. > Then tags become something that are just for manual manipulation. What > do you think? So you wouldn't generally end up using tags? And each time you wanted to view a folder you'd really get a new search result? I can see some benefits if you're using time-range based searches (show me all the mail From=20Carl that was received in the last week). And disadvantages as searching might actually be slow at some point? > Ah, that's it. So "xorg-board" only looked like it worked because I had > a "xorg" folder as well. :-) Yea, sorry 'bout that. > Maybe something like that. Let's figure it out later; it's just a number and we can change it without any penalty. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLC1ZeQp8BWwlsTdMRAuiBAJ43aIz8nRXV9XP/XFt6GMdX4YX0zwCgkpDE BkN3E2Rb3RIpz7QRiXF/Rpw= =vvwc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--