Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFD0429E21 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5uLSaUDNLn+s for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01447431FD0 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6B5604079; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=ggMtQBc4gB0jfbqBVPCfnLMbL+R s9L9ZFayVkwfDDQMJXstnDZfvQh6sxMAK5OOfucuN9Ixzum7RsG1/0qfMwj4t8kv RZ/6cqLtkFt5wCIXiWXsFx3zJ9zKtjlP8wnE4cPfofc26d3LeLYoLGkz21u592Dc QS1PCmzUrsk2fKGg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=aieQSXJgeB/tFD7AODA73jV+ld8=; b=g rRHyEPiBCNOukRaAHKZ4deA2WzNUwWdL2jDX4hQ0i89o9BObTw2x/IgzFQNZM04l TuBTqEK9M3Dxy6ItLx+MB3q8aCbn97OCOQZE7ea9maGWRZtS4KBEWsjaMSJMSpap kv+hw+Ba4F1xwIvebOHVhahrV3g0RnLBWAiaXA01Qg= Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [176.46.227.178]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a19.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 935DE604061; Mon, 2 Jan 2012 07:43:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:43:39 +0100 From: Sebastian Spaeth To: David Bremner , Kazuo Teramoto , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Segmentation fault at gmime-iconv with python binding In-Reply-To: <877h1e6r9d.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <877h1e6r9d.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10+58~g935365d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:43:39 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3b2kt3o.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:43:44 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:58:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:57:27 -0200, Kazuo Teramoto wr= ote: >=20 > > notmuch CLI show the message correct. I know nothing about gmime or > > notmuch code, but can this be the case of the python bindings not > > calling g_mime_init() correctly? The python binding are never calling g_mime_init, as that is not exposed to the python bindings. So either libnotmuch needs to take care of that or there needs to be a clear guideline as to when a binding needs to call what gmime stuff itself. Sebastian --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk8B0KsACgkQVYX1jMgnoGJmggCfZVkiD5jz1HePUM0aS3AU/eDb x3kAn1ARFAiPVc/y8UjWbAQTmyMGtbct =2pY1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--