Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7526431FB6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:16:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8deIaSaNQN0q for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63048431FAE for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:16:17 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074422-b7f1f6d00000090b-a0-50291a408d66 Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 05.02.02315.04A19205; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q7DFGFj6002248; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:16 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q7DFGD5Q007553 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1T0wNJ-0001FB-No; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:16:13 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Tomi Ollila Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: emacs: run list-processes after accept-process-output in emacs 23.1 Message-ID: <20120813151613.GN11179@mit.edu> References: <1344165182-29246-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <1344165182-29246-2-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1344165182-29246-2-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpgleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT13WQ0gwwmLzPxOL6zZnMFm9WzmN1 YPI4/HUhi8ezVbeYA5iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDLOfJ/BWPCHt6LvQyNTA+MC7i5GDg4JAROJ 97Pcuhg5gUwxiQv31rOB2EIC+xglpu4N6WLkArI3MEpc/P2GGcI5ySTxsrGNEcJZwijxevsq FpBJLAKqEt2fk0C62QQ0JLbtX84IYosIqEg8aFvPCmIzC0hLfPvdzARiCwukSPS3z2AFaeUV 0JHY878WYnG1xOmnB5lBbF4BQYmTM5+wQLRqSdz495IJpBxkzPJ/HCBhTgFnic87m8GmiwJt mnJyG9sERqFZSLpnIemehdC9gJF5FaNsSm6Vbm5iZk5xarJucXJiXl5qka6pXm5miV5qSukm RnBAuyjtYPx5UOkQowAHoxIP7yU7jQAh1sSy4srcQ4ySHExKorxcEpoBQnxJ+SmVGYnFGfFF pTmpxYcYJTiYlUR4JU4BlfOmJFZWpRblw6SkOViUxHmvpdz0FxJITyxJzU5NLUgtgsnKcHAo SfC+kgQaKliUmp5akZaZU4KQZuLgBBnOAzT8NUgNb3FBYm5xZjpE/hSjopQ4722QhABIIqM0 D64XlnBeMYoDvSLM2wFSxQNMVnDdr4AGMwEN/s6hBjK4JBEhJdXAGPz5y6/LBk6iM8T6NZbN tHb/bG8qq3Gh/7ROpcpct6w3B29m3DKLF8p16LluyzVn1dTm6/565X8mvIv52mdht2hzr7Ja SmjAnx7Fp9vC4sLsvk65r7h7r1jkNEPJnWmGJ4yX+e9fUsh07rt+52uRLXOM2JacFe5mWvV4 01vTSwKTV0ZPswtxUmIpzkg01GIuKk4EAJzuXHMTAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:16:18 -0000 Quoth Tomi Ollila on Aug 05 at 2:13 pm: > When running emacs tests using emacs 23.1.1 the tests block (until timeout) > when emacs function (notmuch-test-wait) is called. > > There is an emacs bug #2930 titled: > 23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinel > > It seems this is present in emacs 23.1. > > Calling list-processes after accept-process-output seems work around > this problem; in case Emacs version is 23.1 a defadvice is activated > to do just that. Should this workaround perhaps go in notmuch-test-wait directly, instead of being implemented as advice? If we do want to keep it as advice, should it go in notmuch-lib.el along with the few other compatibility functions? > --- > > Thanks to Austin for the comments and IRC discussions on the matter. > > test/test-lib.el | 8 ++++++++ > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/test-lib.el b/test/test-lib.el > index 52d9936..4330352 100644 > --- a/test/test-lib.el > +++ b/test/test-lib.el > @@ -35,6 +35,16 @@ > "Disable yes-or-no-p before executing kill-emacs" > (defun yes-or-no-p (prompt) t))) > > +;; Emacs bug #2930: > +;; 23.0.92; `accept-process-output' and `sleep-for' do not run sentinels > +;; seems to be present in Emacs 23.1. > +;; Running `list-processes' after `accept-process-output' seems to work > +;; around this problem. > +(if (and (= emacs-major-version 23) (= emacs-minor-version 1)) > + (defadvice accept-process-output (after run-list-processes activate) > + "run list-processes after executing accept-process-output" > + (list-processes))) > + > (defun notmuch-test-wait () > "Wait for process completion." > (while (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))