Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E159B429E27 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:05:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QmJhFRTqxpt8 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D1E431FBF for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:05:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VdeS3-0000pm-5p; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:05:39 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 10929 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:05:35 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] compactor changes v2 In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+111~ga7964c8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 07:05:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87k3gnqfb4.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:05:47 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > Hi all, this is v2 of [1], incorporating compact related patches from > David, some changes from David's review, some new patches, man page > update, test update. > > Cheers, > Jani. Aside from the one quibble that I already sent seperately, the first 8 patches look OK to me. I have no technical objections to the last 3, but since the change the UI, I'd like to wait a bit for more input from other people.