Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C1F4196F2 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:35:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJi0riHMHxuM for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC77431FC1 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:35:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sspaeth.de (mtec-hg-docking-1-dhcp-204.ethz.ch [129.132.133.204]) (Authenticated sender: sebastian@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a18.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D3403250065; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:35:16 +0200 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Jesse Rosenthal , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] auto-tagging replied messages In-Reply-To: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87pr3iygrx.fsf@jhu.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:35:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87y6gfojvf.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 10:35:21 -0000 On 2010-03-05, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > One element of traditional clients that I've missed in notmuch is the > ability to easily see which messages have been replied to. A look at the > thread structure will often make that clear, but for both searching and > syncing, an "answered" tag would be nice. This patch has been working great so far and is very useful. Can I persuade someone to take this into the notmuch code and have a defcustom as to which tag a reply should get (or disable if nil)? Sebastian