Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A9D431FC0 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeI5IpMfy32n for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com (mail-la0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DE81431FAE for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id er20so817669lab.32 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=hrD4F1jdX5zjhW5kmFgJooPT/g+pzRC2t7pHQQmAswY=; b=e/N3Nthn3gNxZRMRs4GZ+TXlEL7xRlZI76+ivHsUN+WRA7X9ZJFGJWg2cU01fFFZd5 Hb2Kn01Ax2onhaAN0LfLc5zoPloAiHsI7hv4WcEY7GhWRXdc8KiyGdHlTHfSy09hgo2G aI631M8/cqa9YUHZ1oRVmjdLS7SJ6rQo6OScAmRXKUjWXyhCvsUPkQH8h2OSmtlNlw2Y 3wQCJlxyF1cdkRKlUuVhdVe3tCOWV6F0kU63Dx4vyOUSTNz3Pri5bJEzVG3+sH3doHIh klBiR20bLy57Ox7NGEJuZX3kJ0R93ZzQ0a0U+FOct9Oj+gxvqRaz1CBJ/Hc1tGKwl/M7 POWA== X-Received: by 10.152.113.164 with SMTP id iz4mr1795160lab.50.1364595307507; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dsl-hkibrasgw4-50df51-27.dhcp.inet.fi. [80.223.81.27]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm1814128lbk.2.2013.03.29.15.15.05 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:15:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: kedals0@gmail.com, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Strange behavior on manually files moving In-Reply-To: <87vc8me95v.fsf@compaq.home> References: <87vc8me95v.fsf@compaq.home> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+48~gc5630bf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:15:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87ppyhg8ev.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFj2jCsgQzRRuef7U+TQ6gzJQtG2YKmuk2909dRWbSxXvCkGvC7uPOGCrNebYmY/6tYyer X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:15:12 -0000 On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, kedals0@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > When I manually move some messages, these changes are detected by > notmuch but it doesn't remove these files of its database. > I think, it's more clear to show you an example: > > 1) Initialisation > toto@compaq:~$ notmuch new > No new mail. > > 2) I show you the initial location of the message that we will move > toto@compaq:~$ ls /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*message*-20130312-16313= 1#:2,DS > /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*message*-20130312-163131#:2,DS > > 3) we move this message > toto@compaq:~$ mv /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*message*-20130312-16313= 1#:2,DS /home/toto/mail/local/trash/cur/ > > 4) we update notmuch database > toto@compaq:~$ notmuch new > Processed 1 file in almost no time. > No new mail. Removed 1 message. > > 5) we can observe that old message location still exist in the db > toto@compaq:~$ notmuch search --output=3Dfiles tag:draft folder:local/= trash/ > /home/toto/mail/local/trash/cur/#*message*-20130312-163131#:2,DS > /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*message*-20130312-163131#:2,DS > > 6) but no file exist at this location. > toto@compaq:~$ ls /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*message*-20130312-16313= 1#:2,DS > ls: impossible d'acc=C3=A9der =C3=A0 /home/toto/mail/drafts/cur/#*mess= age*-20130312-163131#:2,DS: Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce type > > > I don't understand this problem because this usecase is close from a > file deletion which works. > > Would anyone have an idea ? What do you have in 'notmuch config get new.ignore'? Have you changed this setting recently? I could reproduce something similar by adding an ignore on a folder that had files indexed by notmuch: $ cd /path/to/maildir $ mkdir foo $ mkdir bar $ # deliver a message to foo/baz $ notmuch new Processed 1 file in almost no time. Added 1 new message to the database. $ notmuch config set new.ignore foo $ mv foo/baz bar $ notmuch new --debug (D) add_files_recursive, pass 1: explicitly ignoring /path/to/maildir/foo Processed 1 file in almost no time. No new mail. $ notmuch search --output=3Dfiles folder:bar /path/to/maildir/foo/baz /path/to/maildir/bar/baz Note that the last search finds messages that have at least one associated file in a folder matching bar, and then outputs *all* the associated files for the messages. Here, the ignore has caused notmuch to not notice the file in foo has been deleted. BR, Jani.