Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FC2431FAF for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r-Qwf+uWsJyK for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-8.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.37]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5984431FAE for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 21:11:18 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 12074425-b7f606d0000008ea-35-50d14c74d396 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id F9.E7.02282.47C41D05; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:11:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id qBJ5BGIG027611; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:11:16 -0500 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id qBJ5BDso011629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:11:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TlBw1-0002Ae-Gj; Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:11:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 00:11:13 -0500 From: Austin Clements To: Mark Walters Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Use invisibility to toggle display of all parts including multipart Message-ID: <20121219051113.GN6187@mit.edu> References: <1355858880-16329-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1355858880-16329-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpkleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0S3xuRhgcO2CtsXquTwW12/OZHZg 8tg56y67x7NVt5gDmKK4bFJSczLLUov07RK4Mjr3LmApeMlRcfrGL8YGxl9sXYycHBICJhK3 l+9hhLDFJC7cWw8U5+IQEtjHKLHyaxsrhLOBUWLrmV52COcik8SFiWdZQVqEBJYwSqzp1gSx WQRUJdpv/2MGsdkENCS27V8ONlZEQEfi9qEF7CA2s4C0xLffzUxdjBwcwgKJEv8a5EHCvALa En/7etkgRnpKrJp8lR0iLihxcuYTFohWLYkb/16CtYKMWf6PAyTMKeAlse3bV7ASUQEViSkn t7FNYBSahaR7FpLuWQjdCxiZVzHKpuRW6eYmZuYUpybrFicn5uWlFula6OVmluilppRuYgSH tIvqDsYJh5QOMQpwMCrx8EqsuBAgxJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZT3pffFACG+pPyUyozE4oz4otKc 1OJDjBIczEoivLyqQDnelMTKqtSifJiUNAeLkjjvjZSb/kIC6YklqdmpqQWpRTBZGQ4OJQne HSBDBYtS01Mr0jJzShDSTBycIMN5gIavBKnhLS5IzC3OTIfIn2JUlBLnPQaSEABJZJTmwfXC Us4rRnGgV4R5i0CqeIDpCq77FdBgJqDBQXoXQAaXJCKkpBoY5/RzRYZOsQtaXXGn/NFnI5s5 prM8pq99Yat3OT38+aeld/w6u8IdSj49WZN4Q+Kt02K2i4sNNwRm6Hl8mnW1vdi8eEm+1nae OUHn7gfnL34hfu6bt9/sSyszfd7aWc1W8XkuryW86Hqv91Mr5lLBwl/fHyY/m8WbdG//Ht24 82KbTlj+l9dLVmIpzkg01GIuKk4EAFPZ+FwUAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 05:11:19 -0000 Quoth Mark Walters on Dec 18 at 7:27 pm: > This is an alternative version of > id:1355781287-6010-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com based on > top of Austin's patch at > id:1355812810-32747-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu > > Austin's patch significantly simplifies the invisibility handling > taking this series down from 90/27 to 68/26 in diffstat terms. > > In general terms Austin's approach has to be the right thing to do: > what we want to do just before the freeze is less clear. My view is > that we should go with Austin's approach now so that at least any bugs > we get from it and (more likely) from this series apply to master as > well. > > I am posting this series to make it easier for people to judge the two > approaches when finished (ie with part invisibility too). > > I attach a trimmed diff from v4 below the diffstat (note this was a > diff with -U10 which I have trimmed so it is purely for information) > > Note we no longer need patch 4/5 because in this approach the overlays > do not need to know about other overlays. > > Best wishes > > Mark LGTM.