From: "Sebastian Spaeth" <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Jesse Rosenthal <jrosenthal@jhu.edu>,
	Notmuch development list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: sort order regression
In-Reply-To: <87ljcfqjl3.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87bpdbmvj0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87wrvz7ex3.fsf@jhu.edu>
	<87vdbj7elk.fsf@jhu.edu> <87tyr37e4p.fsf@jhu.edu>
	<87ljcfqjl3.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:28:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87mxwur5jl.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Precedence: list

On 2010-04-22, Carl Worth wrote:
> On 22 Apr 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> > 
> > jkr and I noticed that patch series are shown in reverse order now, in
> > fact threads seem to display messages at the same depth in reverse
> > chronological order now.
> 
> My fault! Sorry about that.

No harm done, no need to be sorry. We are pre-1.0 in a development
branch, what should we expect :) ? 

> So in my defense, it wasn't my fault[*] I didn't notice the
> regression. It was the test suite's fault for not testing "notmuch show"
> at all.

Ohh, that is a good point. Maybe I should write some :-). Is the test
suite going to be changed any day now or does it still make sense to
write tests for the "monolitic" test suite?

Sebastian