Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58B34196F2 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ejnZi7DCg1eo for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com (mail-bw0-f210.google.com [209.85.218.210]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50B6431FC1 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so3834802bwz.30 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.15 with SMTP id n15mr4155278bkn.158.1271051161853; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm35036677bkl.14.2010.04.11.22.45.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7389B5941E1; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:45:57 +0100 (BST) To: Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch list Subject: Re: RFC: User-Agent header In-Reply-To: <87hbnhprk0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87iq821hba.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87hbnhprk0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 06:45:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87iq7xw7e2.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:46:04 -0000 On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:12:15 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > After some research, this is what I found/propose: > ... Please make the insertion of User-Agent optional. Some might not want it. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org