To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
	Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] emacs: Re-implement advance/rewind functions of
	notmuch-show-mode.
In-Reply-To: <87zkefhsz8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <id:"1324553312-10972-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org">
	<1324665712-2419-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<87ipl7kt82.fsf@gmail.com>
	<cunpqfbtxu2.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87fwg71tdo.fsf@gmail.com>
	<cun39c7t2mi.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87zkefhsz8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+107~ga2d0215 (http://notmuchmail.org)
	Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 07:56:47 +0000
Message-ID: <cunty4msb0g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 14:24:11 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=
ucture.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:00:21 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > Understood. For me this fell inside the 'trivial other change' boundary.
>=20
> Fwiw, I don't remember there ever being such a distinction.  I think
> we've always insisted that unrelated changes should be excluded.

I didn't mean to claim that the project had such a rule, just that I did.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk75ej8ACgkQaezQq/BJZRZmSQCeODR+qcx+l8tJFHHjkd+lG7CF
Y4oAnRO6CmZrcehr5EBJka+57Aos8m4N
=F7sf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--