Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9902431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id yVoFaFnAe5oI for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com
	[209.85.212.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E71BD431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ex7so4348815wid.13
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent
	:from:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=1OJsguNGqls2JFvwpeF0cY+5TFIZyuKfwCGFsgQI7sQ=;
	b=N49sxrx19nBm/BFHON9cM/DpJ5OCNcOFHv+CjFwQJkkO6BaODQWP+bGVgb3PgKIvcv
	KYzR8HcP6VtYG2KnDQMYyD1sF0BAU4d7X3+XVTgK8i2e4FeIk+8rSsxklXQ4fhPw+Lfh
	gFtQNB6c4OUZQjaVanmkjOzNKC14pDdRc3R6Zm5eUbIN7Ir/PLpWOv4GnW1S+WWn8lCT
	c+TdenjX4tbgPDro+n4mJgEqSPCpLh8TpYnEZ/7Xi4bMlS+TA9zcphXNi/4AbzjbCHXJ
	r+cLfZWlcZQZV5UWBucP3W17RrLf9fGjT3KWU9wtT80EUM2XzgmVwsasjFejWjC/VIuR
	BmWA==
X-Gm-Message-State:
 ALoCoQmvdlvay6fbuI+GrwgbAZaFUlSVBRGR9cCRpkZZAhz4SJpkCq+J9l2kynTtH4C9X7MJghN0
X-Received: by 10.180.211.76 with SMTP id na12mr23649849wic.57.1410791188635; 
	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2a01:348:1a2:1:f00a:9c2f:b998:3319])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p1sm14969943wjy.22.2014.09.15.07.26.27
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
Subject: Re: multiple machine tagging
In-Reply-To: <20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>
References: <87vdaj2d4p.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
	<m2bnqhkn8j.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>
	<20140915141410.GA31881@odin.tremily.us>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
	(x86_64-apple-darwin)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 15:26:26 +0100
Message-ID: <m28ullklil.fsf@fenchurch.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 14:26:35 -0000

On Mon, Sep 15 2014, W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 02:49:16PM +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20 2010, David Edmondson wrote:
>> (Wow, was it really more than four years ago?)
>> 
>> > What's the current state of the art in merging tags from multiple
>> > machines?
>> >
>> > In my own case the contents of the mail store can be considered
>> > identical on the different machines. Automated tagging is mostly fine
>> > - it can just happen on each of the machines. Any hand-added tags are
>> > a problem, though.
>> 
>> Is there any significant change to this picture?
>
> Does nmbug not do this for you?  This is exactly what it was designed
> to do (sync tags).

Perhaps. Is anyone using it for personal tag sync?