Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D57429E59 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zVaZOPv815bD for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D678431FDB for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD5DB100086; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:30:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Jani Nikula , John Lenz , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: cli: add --include-html option to notmuch show In-Reply-To: <87k3jjutpf.fsf@nikula.org> References: <87k3jjutpf.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+3~g340c058 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:31:10 -0000 On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013, John Lenz wrote: >> On Sun Aug 4 14:47 -0500 2013, Tomi Ollila wrote: >>> The next question is should we have new option as >>> >>> --include-html >>> >>> or as >>> >>> --include-html=(true|false) >>> >>> or even >>> >>> --body=(true|false|text-and-html) >>> >>> See --exclude option in http://notmuchmail.org/manpages/notmuch-search-1/ >>> and --body option in http://notmuchmail.org/manpages/notmuch-show-1/ >>> for comparison... >>> >> >> I have no preference here, although I guess I would vote for >> --include-html=(true|false) since adding it to --body makes the --body >> options confusing: to make sense the body options should be >> --body=(text|text-and-html|none) but of course you can't change that and >> break the command line API. Well, maybe you could add all three >> --body=(text|text-and-html|none) and still accept true/false for >> compatibility. > > Hi John & Tomi - > > We could trivially amend the argument parser to |= the keyword values > (instead of =) to allow specifying keywords arguments multiple times on > the command line. With the keyword values specified as bit flags, we > could then have 'notmuch show --body=text --body=html ...' return both > text and html, and allow trivial future extension too. > > --body=true and --body=false could be handled specially for backwards > compatibility, for example by forcing text only or no parts, > respectively. Since the default is currently text, --body=none might be > a suitable synonym for --body=false, while the boolean alternatives > could be deprecated. > > A little less trivially it's also possible to support e.g. comma > separated keyword values, such as --body=text,html but I do prefer the > (implementation) simplicity of the above. I've also thought along these lines (except this possibility to give argument multiple times)... But when I wrote my first reply I did not realise that the default behaviour is to include all text/* parts *except* text/html. i.e. text/html is excluded as as special case (and non-excluded parts contain text/plain, text/calendar, text/whatnot etc...). How to do clean interface/implementation using --body is not trivial (if possible). I played with options like false/none -- true/text/plain -- all/textall/* and came to a conclusion that maybe --include-html is the best option after all. Now, if we have --include-html should it be like that or --include-html=(true|false). Currently we have both cases, adding --verify, --decrypt, --create-folder, --batch, -no-hooks to the set... I cannot get a clear opinion (without wast^H^H^H^H spending excessive amount of time figuring these out) how this should be, therefore I'm inclined to the opinion that the current patch from John with simple --include-html could be applied, and in the future (if it is of anyone's interest) we update the parser allowing boolean --arg equal --arg=true. Then it is just how we decide to document these... Tomi > > Untested patch to the argument parser below. > > Cheers, > Jani. > > > diff --git a/command-line-arguments.c b/command-line-arguments.c > index bf9aeca..c426054 100644 > --- a/command-line-arguments.c > +++ b/command-line-arguments.c > @@ -23,7 +23,10 @@ _process_keyword_arg (const notmuch_opt_desc_t *arg_desc, char next, const char > while (keywords->name) { > if (strcmp (arg_str, keywords->name) == 0) { > if (arg_desc->output_var) { > - *((int *)arg_desc->output_var) = keywords->value; > + if (arg_desc->opt_type == NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD_FLAGS) > + *((int *)arg_desc->output_var) |= keywords->value; > + else > + *((int *)arg_desc->output_var) = keywords->value; > } > return TRUE; > } > @@ -146,6 +149,7 @@ parse_option (const char *arg, > > switch (try->opt_type) { > case NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD: > + case NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD_FLAGS: > return _process_keyword_arg (try, next, value); > break; > case NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN: > diff --git a/command-line-arguments.h b/command-line-arguments.h > index de1734a..085a492 100644 > --- a/command-line-arguments.h > +++ b/command-line-arguments.h > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ enum notmuch_opt_type { > NOTMUCH_OPT_BOOLEAN, /* --verbose */ > NOTMUCH_OPT_INT, /* --frob=8 */ > NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD, /* --format=raw|json|text */ > + NOTMUCH_OPT_KEYWORD_FLAGS, /* the above with values OR'd together */ > NOTMUCH_OPT_STRING, /* --file=/tmp/gnarf.txt */ > NOTMUCH_OPT_POSITION /* notmuch dump pos_arg */ > }; > > > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch