Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4345431FD0 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:52:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPzba7njR6qG for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-8.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.37]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECBE431FB6 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:52:48 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 12074425-b7f116d0000008fe-86-4ee2671090ee Received: from mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.39]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 3C.5B.02302.01762EE4; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:52:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-4.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id pB9JqlBG032110; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:52:48 -0500 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id pB9JqjfV012192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:52:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RZ6WY-0000K3-9j; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:54:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 14:54:26 -0500 From: Austin Clements To: Dmitry Kurochkin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] show: Pass notmuch_message_t instead of path to show_message_body. Message-ID: <20111209195426.GJ3190@mit.edu> References: <1322446871-14986-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1323027100-10307-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1323027100-10307-2-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <87ty597eh8.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ty597eh8.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT1xVIf+Rn0HFYwOLq1n52i+s3ZzI7 MHnsnHWX3ePZqlvMAUxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBm7e96zF5znqGh/s4m9gfEnWxcjJ4eEgInE z71PWCBsMYkL99YDxbk4hAT2MUocnNfACOGsZ5RYurmBBcI5wSSxv2MPVNkSRolHT7cxgvSz CKhIfJi0hQnEZhPQkNi2fzlYXETAUOLWxVfMIDazgLTEt9/NYDXCArESDRvug8V5BbQlDu/Z wgox9DSjxMlNj9ggEoISJ2dCHMgsoCVx499LoGYOsEHL/3GAmJwC6hJbbzmBVIgCnTDl5Da2 CYxCs5A0z0LSPAuheQEj8ypG2ZTcKt3cxMyc4tRk3eLkxLy81CJdC73czBK91JTSTYzgwHZR 3cE44ZDSIUYBDkYlHl5Pr0d+QqyJZcWVuYcYJTmYlER541KAQnxJ+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmpxYcY JTiYlUR4VeSBcrwpiZVVqUX5MClpDhYlcd6GXQ/9hATSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLIyHBxKErwBqUCN gkWp6akVaZk5JQhpJg5OkOE8QMNDI0GGFxck5hZnpkPkTzEqSonzmoAkBEASGaV5cL2wxPOK URzoFWFeJZAqHmDSgut+BTSYCWjwl+wHIINLEhFSUg2MjBeYzzTav72tc+/SQSNP1n8OH76m PnsltDdq4stdt7z+LAl47eF5TVXq8MpJE2bWbwyxcaht1/wxe9r+X78PO33YV/2/8Gd2kPfc 5Iim5Cm8Ft+vFF07KVa3N+PF5kM3TRZaVLC/FzmvFSsw/+oSlRP/upu/ytmGP1D85VaTujfG X3Bq16fdHUosxRmJhlrMRcWJADh+3DsXAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:52:50 -0000 Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Dec 09 at 11:05 pm: > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:31:37 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > > } > > > > notmuch_status_t > > -show_message_body (const char *filename, > > +show_message_body (notmuch_message_t *message, > > const notmuch_show_format_t *format, > > notmuch_show_params_t *params) > > Is show_message_body() (or functions that it calls/would call) supposed > to modify the message structure? If not, we should make it const. That would be nice, but lack of const in libnotmuch makes it difficult to do this (for example, notmuch_message_get_filename, which show_message_body calls, takes a non-const notmuch_message_t *). OTOH, since functions like notmuch_message_get_filename lazily compute fields of notmuch_message_t and C has no equivalent of C++'s mutable, it's not clear making the message const is even the right thing to do. > I would also make all pointers constant (i.e. const notmuch_message_t > *const message), but I can not insist since it is not common in notmuch. > > Regards, > Dmitry