From: Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com>
To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] emacs: Provide scaffolding so that the new `shr'
	HTML renderer can run.
In-Reply-To: <cunpqfjxqhu.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
References: <1324309559-7993-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<8762hbkas3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<cun62hbzllt.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<8739cfjp2r.fsf@gmail.com>
	<cunpqfjxqhu.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+95~g2eb2694 (http://notmuchmail.org)
	Emacs/24.0.92.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:09:28 -0700
Message-ID: <87zkeni5s7.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: list

On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:33:01 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 07:27:24 -0700, Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 08:35:42 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:38:36 -0700, Chris Gray <chrismgray@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > +		(makunbound 'gnus-summary-buffer) ; Blech.
> > > > 
> > > > This is working around a bug in gnus.  I think the better solution would
> > > > be for gnus to fix the bug.  The following patch against gnus works for
> > > > me.  (I have tried submitting it to the gnus bug list, but have not been
> > > > able to check if it got through.)
> > > 
> > > I wonder if `boundp' is just a typo for `bufferp'?
> > 
> > I originally thought so as well, but bufferp blows up if given an
> > unbound variable and buffer-name blows up if given a string.
> 
> When would `gnus-summary-buffer' ever be unbound?

In the optimal situation where we were able to use mm-decode without
requiring gnus.el, then gnus-summary-buffer would be unbound.

Cheers,
Chris