Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC491431FAF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QlJIZno7orBN for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E53431FAE for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XgVdu-0005EK-Qc; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 06:22:14 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 14439 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:22:09 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Gaute Hope , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: performance-test/README gpg key outdated? In-Reply-To: <1413880475-astroid-0-wpmn76icgq-3860@strange> References: <1413880475-astroid-0-wpmn76icgq-3860@strange> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+131~gdd8373f (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:22:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87siih93r2.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:22:25 -0000 Gaute Hope writes: > Hi, > > seems like the info about the gpg key for David Bremner is outdated in > the file performance-test/README (fingerprint does not match). At least > there exists a newer key at pgp.mit.edu, am I being scammed? I have multiple keys, but the older one has not yet been revoked. For me, verification works fine with both keys in my keyring. d