Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3CA429E20 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:59:51 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F7-vlZR0vUJJ; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99418431FB6; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CDBF2540DE; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:59:50 +1000 (EST) From: Carl Worth To: Austin Clements , Mark Anderson Subject: Re: Strange match to my query In-Reply-To: <8762tc2yqi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <3wd4o8wa7fx.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> <8762tc2yqi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:59:50 +1000 Message-ID: <8739og2oix.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:59:51 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:19:17 +1000, Carl Worth wrote: > And thanks, Mark for the bug report and the nice test case. I'll add > this to the test suite, and fix it. And that will give us yet one more > reason for all of us to rebuild our databases after the upcoming > release. I've added a test case for this now, fixed the bug, and pushed out the new code. Thanks again for the bug report. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNP7hW6JDdNq8qSWgRAhjXAJ0Y0MJE0/MaVbAe36L+Cu1FeJz0BQCggmS0 4IcWkLClfkwtcDXWpUFTBXY= =rEDs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--