From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <20091209132446.GC23878@blackspot>
References: <20091126202347.GA16654@blackspot>
	<1260364206-344-1-git-send-email-meskio@sindominio.net>
	<20091209132446.GC23878@blackspot>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 12:08:43 -0800
Message-ID: <877hsv6hbo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator
Precedence: list

--=-=-=

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:24:46 +0100, Ruben Pollan <meskio@sindominio.net> wrote:
> Do you like to call them regress? Should I change that?

I don't love the name, (since it's so close to the word "regression"
which has a totally different meaning in software context). But I also
don't have an immediate suggestion for an improved name yet either.

> What about the functions notmuch_*_is_first? Is kind of reversed logic than
> notmuch_*_has_more, the last are true when is not reach the limit but the
> first ones are true when the limit is reached. But I think it make sense like
> that.

I'd like a more symmetric API here. Anyone have a favorite set of names
for iterating a list in two directions?

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLIAPM6JDdNq8qSWgRAjK4AJ4n0L40UYTOqOrpYfppvX6s3v65IACdGdh0
qvUg1GCc1AI+408e8EV+RQM=
=7Bb1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--