Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ABB431FAE for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:29:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C4pDUdgQy6KM for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:29:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-8.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.37]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FD0431FAF for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 17:29:39 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074425-b7f4a6d0000008e0-16-4f5d4372ce00 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-8.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id FB.69.02272.2734D5F4; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:29:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q2C0Tbdv031921; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:29:38 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q2C0Taku011362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1S6t8q-00037y-A0; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:29:36 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 20:29:36 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] reply: Require that only one message is returned Message-ID: <20120312002936.GA2754@mit.edu> References: <1329893199-21630-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <1329893199-21630-4-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <87fwdh8jmh.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fwdh8jmh.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFuplleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0S1yjvU3uHlN1+LInlnsFk3TnS2u 35zJ7MDscev+a3aPZ6tuMXs0/VjMGsAcxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWxcspq5oLD7BWnrp9ia2Bs Yuti5OSQEDCRuDHrFTOELSZx4d56oDgXh5DAPkaJ/9PvskM4GxglfjXNgnJOMkncWTCRBcJZ wijxbNt8VpB+FgFVie/Td7GA2GwCGhLb9i9nBLFFBBQlNp/cD2YzCzhLPD7+GmyfsICfROOx brB6XgFtiT+tExkhhs5klFj0oxUqIShxcuYTFohmLYkb/14ydTFyANnSEsv/cYCYnEC77r0T B6kQFVCRmHJyG9sERqFZSJpnIWmehdC8gJF5FaNsSm6Vbm5iZk5xarJucXJiXl5qka6FXm5m iV5qSukmRnCou6juYJxwSOkQowAHoxIPL5dBlL8Qa2JZcWXuIUZJDiYlUV5/x1h/Ib6k/JTK jMTijPii0pzU4kOMEhzMSiK8Dw2BcrwpiZVVqUX5MClpDhYlcV5NrXd+QgLpiSWp2ampBalF MFkZDg4lCd4uJ6BGwaLU9NSKtMycEoQ0EwcnyHAeoOGfQGp4iwsSc4sz0yHypxgVpcR5r4Ek BEASGaV5cL2wVPSKURzoFWHeByBVPMA0Btf9CmgwE9Dgz1zRIINLEhFSUg2MGefn8QXp32Pt v/lq358nLc8fVooWx6Tqa3Ut4Fl0d/LWyOY1lQuf7BKqDPNxtNia2ym6We7HiQQLzxwj0X/M J9ffCffc7X/C8OWiiwaf+grNt5Rc53y67eA6tg/p+XYzZTYa3vsY+01gisSOmWKSpy5Ntmfe ff1z/Nr55kHJOTum3Fkwz9auWYmlOCPRUIu5qDgRAIPfGBcgAwAA Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 00:29:39 -0000 Quoth Jani Nikula on Mar 10 at 1:00 am: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 23:46:32 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > > As the semantics of replying to multiple messages have not yet been > > defined well, make notmuch reply require that the search given returns > > only a single message. > > Is there any real reason, apart from consistency between > --format=default and --format=json, to disable the current multiple > message reply? Also "notmuch show" has format specific features and > limitations. > > I agree the semantics should be clarified, and eventually multiple > message reply should be uniformly supported by all formats, including > --format=json, but IMHO this patch should be dropped (and the TODO patch > amended accordingly). I agree with Jani. We might as well leave the existing format as it is and say in the TODO that we should both fix multiple reply and support it in the JSON format. > BR, > Jani.