Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79FA6421192 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xiHpcG7MOBrI for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95F3429E25 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D6B2E50DE0; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:32 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (DHCP-123-180.caltech.edu [131.215.123.180]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC8C2E50DD9; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 105115CC; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:24 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Mark Walters , Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] cli: add --do-not-exclude option to count and search. In-Reply-To: <871uqgdrsf.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <8762fu4aqt.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <1327862394-14334-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <20120131041732.GY17991@mit.edu> <871uqgdrsf.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+128~g6f388fa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:31:21 -0800 Message-ID: <8739av3kbq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:31:38 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:40:00 +0000, Mark Walters wrote: > The reason I went for verbose do-not-exclude was to try and avoid the > double negative ambiguity: does no-exclude mean do-not-exclude or > do-note-return-excluded-messages. Possibly I am worrying needlessly, and > obviously I am quite happy to change. I also think "no-exclude" or "no-excludes" would be more appropriate. It's not a command that people will likely use that frequently, so as long as it's well documented it will be fine. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPKBdZAAoJEO00zqvie6q8m+EP/1EHuy+7gMb6WxPck4EXrlY6 pqpmXUHUzhwU3UDBfAH6VZ3L/dnZdpDwr2/Wjqety7F1PNts1XLXTzAy4Qiu9UEh XpG2NLAy5KVAC0QYqMgcH3A6hE5jqPwoCpBSrzpU0p7kUg3CjotpePS1FgJO8tOx SR49L25pCNK9edIZKjycO74E0ax3JkeAUyUIhra07gqVSG0VL5y+9Wg/RIU1q+7h C7q0soA6cPeaQxjrjcTDaAoGHzWDv403QbOUwrzh6JCPkCVstizvBJ8PAu+SNXGS cTkVGwd6c/82xDcvop3rRqqHsfh2eDY8LB8qhmWyHNkgY5Ug52D0j2EjPtKv1HD+ 8X/w/GTCDpAjj1m5PNTs/OBgJKawQDfrx+ha/AtcusnuyHlpCWUhWQ747YfE/Ntl f0gOJbnkFUfrqsYG99OktfxWoNIQRFOCQe4qM5FxEjfhrfsb0JgVrQGfQR9kgF+I ciXqW3IF8ZkgQkWr3G/ABMWuZKW/a6aUSeisaoYFqNON854D1553qv0ipAa0qWtY 8t9XBFd6O8MtuP7Sgp+kijgGMjC8lkYd64j3NIxbnedMny6k4CIYkXTk7wttE+ZV tB6GgS+qCkTfKzF/8NkrcdEAmqO3jqz886MBoyD5rFxfUK4vBHrphh9zvZE3ubDS bhTw9MKNRXz4ZFMW5nm2 =xK6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--