To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
From: Lele Gaifax <lele@metapensiero.it>
Subject: Re: New "notmuch address" command
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:56:34 +0100
Organization: Nautilus Entertainments
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <87fvcioyal.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>
References: <878uid9qjl.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>
	<87ppbpf8yy.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> <874mt19iho.fsf@nautilus.nautilus>
	<87388inway.fsf@resox.2x.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+dIl2V4dgDq+VfvFuo0q0YqoPbY=
Precedence: list

Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> writes:

> On Pá, pro 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>> It's not just a matter of filtering, but rather *which* address is
>> emitted: trying it out, in the case above the "foo@bar.com" is not even
>> mentioned in the output, because it appears only as a CCed recipient.
>
> Are you saying that Cc address is not printed or that you want it not to
> be printed? If the former than it is a bug. The following test passes
> for me, i.e. foo@bar.com is printed.

Ouch, you are right, I stand corrected: I completely missed the
--output=recipients option, and I see that by default it prints only the
sender.

Sorry for the noise,
thank you and bye, lele.
-- 
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
lele@metapensiero.it  |                 -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.