Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EFF431FBD;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 13:37:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id owWjWB7nmfc8; Wed,  9 Dec 2009 13:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC7431FAE;
	Wed,  9 Dec 2009 13:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B0BBF2542FD; Wed,  9 Dec 2009 13:37:37 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <1260392368-sup-9167@testarossa>
References: <20091126202347.GA16654@blackspot>
	<1260364206-344-1-git-send-email-meskio@sindominio.net>
	<20091209132446.GC23878@blackspot>
	<877hsv6hbo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<1260392368-sup-9167@testarossa>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:37:31 -0800
Message-ID: <871vj36d7o.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: notmuch <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Added regress option to tags iterator
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:37:39 -0000

--=-=-=

On Wed, 9 Dec 2009 14:21:04 -0700, Mark Anderson <markr.anderson@amd.com> wrote:
> I think that changing has_more is going to be a requirement to come up with a consistent set of names.

What? You don't want to pair it with has_less ?

-Carl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLIBib6JDdNq8qSWgRAqAXAJ9q6XjR0LYz8Wzm9pYUNz2Mp6c0jwCfZRxU
HcGorzSROVUskbx3/NnMxZQ=
=7u14
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--