Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047CE431FB6 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:27:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t2c1h9OJIOTW for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B19D431FAF for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVKAg-0001rA-KK; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:26:06 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 11499 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:25:53 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jean-Marc Liotier , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Alternative to no longer supported folder:foo* wildcard matching ? In-Reply-To: <54FEE1D2.9000108@liotier.org> References: <54FDFAAB.9080504@liotier.org> <877fupzuzc.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <54FE37F4.7090605@liotier.org> <87a8zlxr86.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <54FEE1D2.9000108@liotier.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+67~gdbe9924 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:25:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87siddrnku.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:27:05 -0000 Jean-Marc Liotier writes: > I would have prefered explicit folder inclusion/exclusion at query time > and path inclusion/exclusion at indexing time... But I guess I'll get > used to notmuch's logic of tagging everything and then using the tags. In general tags are helpful (or just full text searches). But it does seem like maildir++ (.foo.bar folders) would be reasonable to support directly. I have the impression from my experiments with symlinks that the cost in database bloat is not too bad. A simple matter of programming ;). d