Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F00B4196F0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:51:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ABRWiR2-K6T; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D44431FC1; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:51:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B3167568DEC; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:51:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: dme@dme.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Remove duplicate declaration of `notmuch-folders' In-Reply-To: <1272294583-18209-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> References: <1272294583-18209-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-202-g01ec4d3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:51:22 -0700 Message-ID: <874oiydrvp.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:51:24 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:09:43 +0100, dme@dme.org wrote: > From: David Edmondson [no commit message] Thanks, David. Allow me the chance to try to convince you that *every* commit requires a sentence or two of justification, (beyond the one-line summary just stating "what" the patch does). There's *always* some utility to saying "why". Take this current patch which seems so simple. There were two declarations, so one had to go. What more could there be to say? For me, when reviewing this, I wondered "How did there come to be two different declarations?", and "Is this patch removing the right one?". So I had to go grep through the source to figure out what had happened. I could have avoided that if the commit had said something like: This variable was moved from notmuch.el to notmuch-lib.el some time ago, but the declaration in notmuch.el was left around. Clean that up. [And I just pushed the patch with this added.] Whether or not that convinces you, perhaps you can humor me and always try to come up with something to say, even when it seems there's nothing possible to add. If nothing else, it can be a fun challenge. If you need more beyond that, you can try writing your commit message as a haiku. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL1dKa6JDdNq8qSWgRAlEZAJwIZkplMmDXqySGOM3ymp2F8ErgdQCfbNEj sthNcCwEq2KdRF7/J8eGHHc= =BF6j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--