Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A65431FAF for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCSm2jUAAkER for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8940A431FAE for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id 6119D68055; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:13:18 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Mark Walters , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] emacs: modify help message for notmuch-search-line-faces to reflect preferred "deleted" tag name. In-Reply-To: <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87vcoaywyu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87iph06h72.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <87ty0k4v5o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:13:25 -0000 On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15 2012, Mark Walters wrote: >> This patch is trivially correct regardless of the rest of the >> series. >> >> I think the rest of the series (which provides keybindings for >> adding/removing the delete tag to messages/threads) is worthwhile >> particularly now the exclude stuff is fairly complete (feedback at the >> time looked positive). > > Sorry, I wish I could have purged all of these series from the list. > After a very protracted discussion on the topic it was decided that > notmuch will not support any delete tagging operations. Users who wish > to do so can add support on their own: > > id:"87sjgk2xzf.fsf@servo.finestructure.net" > http://notmuchmail.org/excluding/ > > I highly recommend *not* re-starting this discussion. There is no > solution that will satisfy everyone. Just let it be. Move on. Nothing > to see here. These are not the tags you're looking for... id:"1326826969-23545-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net" Does just "delete" -> "deleted" change: the only question I have left is that should that be left as is, this change made, or just drop the "delete" coloring altogether ? > > jamie. Tomi