Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0124196F3 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRCSs9H6JKmk for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com (mail-bw0-f210.google.com [209.85.218.210]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0004196F2 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so4825970bwz.30 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.33.16 with SMTP id f16mr1113721bkd.11.1269592000235; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uf.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1sm5717257bkl.8.2010.03.26.01.26.37 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 26 Mar 2010 01:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uf.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 913E05941EB; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:26:47 +0000 (GMT) To: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87vdcjheqz.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <87iq8o76r8.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> <87d3yudvja.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> <87tys557y5.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87zl1wg3vi.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> <87vdcjheqz.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: David Edmondson Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:26:47 +0000 Message-ID: <8739znv67s.fsf@uf.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] JSON based emacs UI X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:26:42 -0000 On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:12 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" wrote: > That worked. Thanks. BTW is there a way to get '=' to reload the thread > details. Something similar to notmuch-search-refresh-view. for the show > window. I'll look at adding it. > That would make sure i can get the tag updated tag details by using = > key. right now it is difficult to find out whether i "unread" tag is > removed from a message or not. The best fix would be to show the > updated tag dynamically This is now fixed. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org