Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB675431FBC for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.204, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0eQXjtAkhXf for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 30951 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at olra; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 PST Received: from samir.ibcsolutions.de (samir.ibcsolutions.de [78.47.90.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3E2431FAE for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:14:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from 80-254-74-36.dynamic.swissvpn.net ([80.254.74.36] helo=barf) by samir.ibcsolutions.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVTGm-0005yw-Nu; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:14:04 +0100 From: Arvid Picciani To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <4B4ED7E8.20501@exys.org> References: <4B4ED7E8.20501@exys.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:13:53 +0100 Message-ID: <878wc0623y.fsf@exys.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] indexing mail? X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:14:08 -0000 On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:38:00 +0100, Arvid Picciani wrote: > on the first run (when no .notmuch is there yet), it finds some > messages, but doesn't index them either. the offending commit is 2c4555f1a56602ff1dd55a63699810522ba4d91e from readdir (3): "Currently, only some file systems (among them: Btrfs, ext2, ext3, and ext4) have full support returning the file type in d_type. All applications must properly handle a return of DT_UNKNOWN." thanks "kanru" for helping on irc.