Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B17407692 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:11:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GI+D-CPmB93j for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gw3.nixu.fi (mail-gw3.nixu.fi [193.209.237.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B83407673 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:11:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (mail-gw3 [127.0.0.1]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id q06M9Y7X026142; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 00:11:04 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by mail-gw3.nixu.fi with ESMTP id 114cs0xu3t-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:11:02 +0200 Received: from taco2.nixu.fi (taco2.nixu.fi [194.197.118.31]) by taco2.nixu.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q06MB1RB009417; Sat, 7 Jan 2012 00:11:01 +0200 From: Tomi Ollila To: Adam Wolfe Gordon , Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] notmuch reply bugfix & reply to sender only In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+157~g442d405 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.5.7110, 1.0.211, 0.0.0000 definitions=2012-01-05_05:2012-01-05, 2012-01-05, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1201060270 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:11:09 -0000 On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 17:01:44 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 13:25, Jani Nikula wrote: > > Bikeshedding topic #1: How about making replying to just the sender the default > > in "notmuch reply", and having --reply-all option (instead of --no-reply-all)? > > > > Bikeshedding topic #2: How about binding 'r' to reply to just the sender by > > default, and making 'R' reply-all (instead of vice versa)? > > I like both these suggestions. This would bring the notmuch behavior > in line with gmail, which is what I tend to expect. I'd like that. I've already once sent a 'group reply' when I intended to sent to only one. +1 for changing 'r' reply sender and 'R' reply all in emacs MUA. > Mark Walters brings up a good point, that there is a question of what > to do when the user tries to reply to their own email. When I do > this, what I intend is to send another email to the last person I > emailed in the thread, so I think the suggested heuristic of looking > at other headers would work. But, maybe others have a different > expectation in this case? Hmm, let's see there was 'Some User(TM)' sending email, and I reply all to that. If I reply (to sender) to the email I just sent, The recipient could be 'Some User(TM)' instead of me. Interesting possibility. Tomi