Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87FE421192 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8JGUGiJyiC2 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5708442118E for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so1004326qwb.26 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.6.196 with SMTP id a4mr997053qca.143.1309384040388; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nikula.org [92.243.24.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d2sm1216691qcs.33.2011.06.29.14.47.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:47:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] emacs: Add pseudo saved search to match mail that no saved search matches In-Reply-To: <87d3hwxt0x.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <87liwkxxfm.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87y60kv1gl.fsf@nikula.org> <87d3hwxt0x.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-232-g917e874 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:47:16 +0000 Message-ID: <87sjqsnwd7.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:47:21 -0000 On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:49:18 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 20:15:22 +0000, Jani Nikula wrote: > > So to clarify, do you prefer having on/off switches, or just enabling > > this without customization at all? Personally I'd shy away from the > > latter, but I guess it depends on how useful vs. distracting people find > > this. > > My opinion is to just make it a feature without any customization at > all. I can see no harm in having these searches always available. That should clean up the code a bit as well. Then we're left with picking the sensible names. I just use "other" and "no tags" myself. Do you see value in e.g. surrounding them in brackets like "[other]" and "[no tags]" to signify they are special? Better ideas? I'm not a native speaker... And while at it, how about also making append the non-customizable, IMHO sensible, default for saved searches in patch 2/4? Jani